Purpose
              Compare your case exposures to typical population exposures from Foodbook to prioritise hypotheses during outbreak investigations.
              How references are computed
              
                - 
                  References use Foodbook microdata with 
                  
                    Survey weights account for sampling design and ensure population-representative estimates from the Foodbook study
                    survey weights
                  
                   (as in OMD's Stata workflow).
                
- 
                  If multiple PTs are selected, a single 
                  
                    Weighted average across selected provinces/territories, maintaining population representativeness
                    combined reference
                  
                   is computed across them.
                
- You can optionally limit the reference by Age Group (0-9, 10-19, 20-64, 65+) and Month.
- Defaults like "Canada" and "All" auto-deselect once you add other selections.
Analysis outputs
              
                - 
                  
                    Proportion of cases exposed: (Yes + Probably) / (Yes + Probably + No)
                    Observed %
                  
                  : (Yes + Probably) / (Yes + Probably + No) in your cases.
                
- 
                  
                    Weighted population exposure percentage from Foodbook survey data, filtered by your selected parameters
                    Reference %
                  
                  : Weighted population exposure % from Foodbook for your selected filters (rounded to 1 decimal).
                
- 
                  
                    Statistical significance: probability of observing this exposure level if the outbreak cases were similar to the general population. Lower values indicate stronger association.
                    P-Value
                  
                  : 
                  
                    Statistical test comparing case exposure proportion to population baseline (upper tail test)
                    Binomial test
                  
                   of observed vs reference % (upper tail).
                
- 
                  
                    Alert (p≤0.05): Strong evidence of association. Borderline (p≤0.10): Moderate evidence. Not Significant (p>0.10): Weak evidence. Insufficient Data: Missing data or zero cases.
                    Classification
                  
                  : Alert (≤0.05), Borderline (≤0.10), Not Significant, or Insufficient Data.
                
Advanced (CEDARS upload)
              
                - Upload the CEDARS Excel export. Expected sheets: ‘case exposure answer’ and ‘Salmonella Case’.
- Columns are auto-detected even if the wording changes (we normalise names).
- We analyse confirmed cases if available in the linelist sheet.
Good practice
              
                - Interpret alongside lab, trace-back, and epi linkage evidence.
- Small totals can be unstable; look for patterns across multiple signals.
- Foodbook is de-identified open data; no direct identifiers are used.
Roadmap
              
                - Optional Bayesian results to complement binomial tests (per OMD collaboration).